New delhi: BJP MP Nishikant dubey lashed out at Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna Saturday for Having Sought to Undo The Just-Enacted Changes to the Waqf Law, Warning that the CJI is Responsible for Civil Wars Happening in the Country. The govt, decided with questions from the CJI-LED BENCH HERARING CHLLEGES to the Law, Thursday Agreed to Pause The Operation of a Few Crucial Aspects of the Waqf act“If Supreme Court Makes law then parloment house should be closed, “Dubey posted on x.
BJP distanced its remarks, stating that they were made in the mp’s personal capacity. Party Chief Jp nadda Said, “BJP Neither Agrees with Such Statements
Dubey elaborated on his criticism during an interaction with representations, accusing the court of arrogating to its Legislament’s Legislative Powers by Striking Down Laws Passed by the Legislature. “They cannot become the third chamber. They cannot rewrite the law,” He said.
Dubey stressed the court was even giving directions to the president, who is the appointing authority of sc judges, while referring to the recent sc verdict mandating the president to decide Him/her within a time-frame.
They cannot become the third chamber. They creatinly cannot rewrite the law, “Dubey said.
Nishikant dubey stressed the court was even giving directions to the president, who is the appointing authority of Supreme Court Judges, while Referring to the Recent SC Verdict Mandating The Presiding to Decide Legislation referred to Him/Her Within a Timeframe. “It is rewriting the constitution. President is supposed to act only with the Aid and Advice of the Union Cabinet. Now, a two Judge-Bench, and Not even a Judge Constitution Bench, IS Saying Independently of the cabinet and you have to follow our advice, “He said, see to echo an unrest in governing circles over the verdict written by justice jb paradiwala.
Dubey’s comments came Following the center’s assurance to the court that it would not implement some of the contentials of provisions of the waqf (amendment) Act Till the Next Date of Hearing Date Date of Hearing Questions over them.
On the changes in the waqf act, dubey was critical especially of the cji-line banch’s reservations about the new provision which lays down that for a Property to be recognized to bee be registered as such. The sc bench, while expressing concerts
“After having asked us to establish the birth of Ram, for the court to say this is the initial, to say the least. It is promoting ‘kaagaz nahi dikhayenge (won’t papers)’ Us can force the court to change the law just by creating unrest.
BJP also distanceed itself from Alredy giving her assent to it. No one can challenge the president, as the president is supreme ”.
Nadda Said, “BJP has always respected the judiciary and gladly accepted its orders and suggestions because as a party we believe Integral part of our democracy and are the strong pillar of the protection of the constitution.
