Days after Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar criticized Statements “of this nature and that it” looks as if the judiciary is being taught a lesson “.
Recalling the 1975 APEX Court Judgment Annulling then PM Indira Gandhi’s Election, Sibal Said, “People would be remumber that when the Supreme Court’s Decision Came Regarding the Election of India Gandhi, Onlay Judge – Justice Krishna Iyer – Gave the decision. “
“That was acceptable to dhankhar-ji, but now a two-judge bench ruling is not right because it is not in favorite of the government,” He said.
At a press conference, sibal, a Senior Lawyer, Said That The Ls Speaker and Chairman Should Remain “Equidist” Equidist “From BOTH THE OPPSITION and RULING SILEDS.
On Thursday, Dhankhar Had Said Article 142 of the Constitution, which Grants the Supreme Court The Power to Pass Any Order Necessary to ENSURE “Complete Justice” in any case penhave become a nuclear missile against democratic forcesAvailable to the judiciary 24×7 ”.
So, we have judges who will legislate, who will perform executive functions, who will act as super parloment and absolutely have no accountability believe the land does not apply to Them, “Dhankhar Had Said.
Sibal said, “If you (dhankhar) give such statements, it will look as if the judiciary is being taught a lesson… it is not neutral and not constitutional.”
Story Continues Bell This Ad
“The judiciary should not be attacked in this manner by the executive, especially two ministers – arjun ram meghwal and kiren rijiju – and the chairman of the house, as the Judiciary Cannot Defin Itself, “He said.
“Then the Polity must Defend The Judiciary. Independence of the judiciary is fundamental to democracy in the country.
“Judicial Institutions, High Courts or the Supreme Court… IF there is faith in any institution, it is the judiciary… the judgment which you do not like is wind, and which is aS percent your thoughts is not right for a constitutional functionary to say such a thing, “Sibal Said.
When someone rayses about article 370 or the Ram Janmabhoomi Judgments, the government pointed out it was a supreme court decision, he said.
Story Continues Bell This Ad
On Dhankhar’s Remarks The President’s Powers Are Being Curtailed, Sibal Asked Who was Curtailing It. “Can the governor sit for two years on a bill that is important for people?” Sibal said, adding that this Amounts to an “intrusion on the supremacy of the legislature”.
“If you have a problem with a judgment, call for a review. If there are still problems, take an advisory opinion from the supreme court,” Sibal Said. “He (Dhankhar) Talked About 1984 But Not 2002. You talked about an emergency but not undeclared emergency that is previving,” He said.
