IndiaFastestNews.in

Latest News Updates

‘Outrightly rejects these statements’: BJP distances itself from Nishikant Dubey, Dinesh Sharma Remarks on Judiciary | India news
India

‘Outrightly rejects these statements’: BJP distances itself from Nishikant Dubey, Dinesh Sharma Remarks on Judiciary | India news


'Outrightly rejects these statements': BJP distances its

New Delhi: Bharatiya Janata Party on Saturday “outrightly rejected” and distanced itself from the statements made by the party mp nishikant dubey and dinesh sharma only the supreme counte India. The two members have also also been asked to refrain from Making Such Statements.
“The Statements Made by Bjp Mp Nishikant Dubey and Dinesh Sharma Regarding The Judiciary and the Chief Justice of the Country Have No Connection Whatsoever with the Bharatiya Janata Party. Statements, but the BJP Neither agrees with
“The Bharatiya Janata Party has Always Respected The Judiciary, Wholeheartedly Accepting Its Orders and Suggestions, as we, as a party, believe that the Supreme Courts, ALOLG ALOLG ALOLG ALOLG ALOLG ALOLG ALOLG ALOLG ALOLG SUP The country, is an integral part of our democracy and a strong pillar in safeguarding the constitution.
Earlier Today, Dubey said, “Sanjiv Khanna is Responsible for All the Civil Wars Happening in this country.”
Taking aim at Supreme Court on Friday, Seasoned BJP Parliamentian Nishikant Dubey in a Cryptic Post on X Wrote, “Kanoon Yadi Supreme Court Hi Banayega To Sansad Bhavan Bund Kar Dena Chahiye (Parliament should be closed down if the supreme court has to make the laws). “
Speaking on similar lines, sharma said, “there is an apprehension amon the public Constitution of India, no one can direct the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha and the President has already given her assent to it.
His remarks come at a sensitive moment, as the Supreme Court Continues to Hear Multiple Petitions Challenging The Constitutionality of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, which was passed by parliament in ear. In response to the court’s concerns, the center has agreed to hold off on implementing certain controversial provisions of the law until the next hearing.
Dubey’s comments Bills – a movement as judicial overreach. The convergence of these developments underscores the growing tension between the judiciary and the executive over the balance of power.