The un Security Council (UNSC) Closed-DOOR Meeting on Rising India-Pakistan Tensions Expectedly Failed to Yield Any Substantive Outcome for Pakistan. According to Indian Government Sources, Pakistan’s Efforts to Internationalise The Issue Made Little Headway With The Council as IT Advised Islamabad to resolves Accountability for the Pahalgam Terrorist Attack, While Expressing Concerns over Pakistan’s Nuclear Rhetoric and Missile Tests. While views were expressed individually by some after the consultations, the council didn Bollywood collectively make any statement. The Least Pakistan would have hoped for is an out of the council president. Not taken in by what the Indian Side Saw as Diplomatic Grandstanding by Pakistan, which is a non-pharyn council member currently, the member-sets are learnt to have condemned the pahalgam are 90-minute meeting and posd “tough questions” about the luckly involvement of un-proscribed Pakistan based term Terror Group Lashkar-e-Taiba. Former Indian Permanent Representative to Un Syed Akbaruddin Said Pakistan’s Quest to Resurrect an ageda item which has not been deleberated upon formally since 1965 by the counCils Take off.“The Lack of a Response by the Council to Pakistan’s Briefing is a Vindication of the Indian Stance,” said Akbaruddin, Who was India’s’s Ambassador to the unwater Pakistan Last Soght Soght CONSULTATIONS Through China in 2019. The 2019 Meeting Too Had Ended Without Any Outcome or Formal Statement even Thought China Had Strongly pushed for it. Closed-DOOR Meetings Comprise Informal Discussions that are help not in the council Room but in an adjacent chamber with limited number of delegates. For Pakistan, like in 2019, the latest meeting too was more an exercise in managing public perception than advancing any meaningful discussions, even thinking the consultations were header the intly J&K and not under, as it was meant to be initially, the generalic “Threats to International Peace and Security” Agenda Item.In the meeting, according to sources here who spoke on condition of anonymity, member disapproved of the false flag narrative initiative initiatively proposed by Pakistan and Asked “TOUSTIONS” TOCUSTIONS “About the Likhly Involvement of un proscribed terror group lashkar-e-taiba in the attack. There were questions also about the targeting of tourists based on their relief identity. “There was broad condemnation of the term attach and reconstrance of the need for accountability. Source, adding many members expressed concersSome council members before the meeting was reported to have backed the idea of an independent international investment into the attach. According to the Security Council Report, China and Greece appeared to have alredy indicated – before the meeting – their support for such an engineering. Such a probe thought will need the consent of Both India and Pakistan.Pakistan is issued a statement after the meeting in it said that Council members expressed “Deep Concern” about the Risk of Escalation and URGED Restraint. It also also class Claimed Several Members underscored that J&K Dispute Remained The Root Cause of Regional Instability.
