There is a directive to the president by a recent judgment. Where are we heading? What is Happening in the Country? We Never Bargained for Democracy for this day. President Being Called Upon to Decide in a Time-Bound Manner, and if not, become law. So we have Judges who will legislate, who will perform executive functions, who will act as super-pariliament, and absolutely have no accountability if accountability is the land do not apps not apply Them.

Addressing these remarks, sibal said in a press conference that it does not suit a constitutional functionary to make such remarks.

With all due respect to the honorable Vice President, Calling Article 142 A ‘Nuclear Missile’ is extramely problem. How can you say this? Do you know article 142 is the power conferred by the Constitution to the Supreme Court? It is not the right given by the government. It is the constitution that has given the right to do complete justice.

Sibal went on to explain that the functions of the President and the Governor are dependent on the Aid and Advice of the Council of Ministers, and this is what the constitution says.

I want to tell this to the citizens of this country, the President of India is a Titular Head. The President Performs Functions as per the Aid and Advice of the Council of Ministers. A governor of a state acts on the Aid and Advice of the Council of Ministers of the State. It is the constitution which says, when the bill is given to the Governor for his assent, he can return the bill to the legislative association. But Once the Legislative Assembly Re-Enacts The Bill, The Governor is bound to give his assent. It is what the constitution says.

He further said:

The governor has the right to reserve the bill for the president’s considers, but it is the union cabinet that will Aid and Advice Her on it. It is not the president’s personal right to do whitever she wants, dhankar ji should be aware of it. He says, you are curtailing the power of the president. Who is doing that? … this is in fact, an intrusion on the supremacy of the legislature. If the parliament passes a bill, can the president sit over it saying that she will not sign? If she does not sign, does someone have the right [to tell her she cannot do that],

Sibal added that there are Continued Attacks on the Independence of the Judiciary.

We must not attack or undermine our judicial institutions. If the Executive Starts Attacking the judiciary, especially when he is the minister and the Chairman of a house, then it seems that … then the judiciary cannot Defend Its fit. Polity of the Country must come forward and Defend the judiciary. We trust the judiciary doing the right thing, [in upholding justice and the Constitution]The independence of the judiciary is fundamental to democracy in this country; Without that all the rights are in Danger as they alredy are.

Addressing the 6th Batch of Rajya Sabha Interns, The Vice President said that as per article 145 (3), a substantial constitutional issue must be decided by a bench with at least 5 judges. However, the decision Against the president was given by a two-judge bench (Justices JB Pardiwala and R. MAHADEVAN).

When the Mandate of five 5-Judges was prescribed, the strength of the Supreme Court was eight. Since the strength of the Supreme Court has increased to 31, there is a need to amend article 145 (3) to raise the number of minimum judges in a constitution bench, the presiding opined.

The Vice President was referring to the Recent Judgment Passed by the Supreme Court In the case against the tamil nadu governor over the delay in granting assent to bills passed by the state assemble. Apart from Laying Down Timelines for the Governor, The Judgment also Set Timelines for the President’s decisions on referred bills as per article 201 of the constitution If the president fails to decide with the prescribed timeframe, the states can approach the courts seeking a written a written agamus against the presidier, the court held.